About Activeeon

Why choose ProActive by Activeeon

Many of our new customers, while facing the challenges and opportunities of Digital Transformation, take advantage of their modernization and/or Cloud Migration to replace their legacy Scheduler/Orchestrator with ActiveEon's innovative Open Source solution.

Just to name few, BMC Control-M, CA Autosys and Automic (UC4, $-Universe, One Automation), IBM Workload Automation (formerly Tivoli), Tibco Data Synapse, IBM Symphony, IBM LSF, Oozie, Yarn, Azkaban, Mesosphere, AWS Batch and Step functions, are being advantageously replaced with ActiveEon's Open Source, flexible, and cost-effective solution.

Here are some of the technical reasons:

ActiveEon scheduling and orchestration solution compared to competitors:

		Workload Automation			Big Compute & Big Data Schedulers
	ActiveEon Scheduler	BMC Control-M	CA AutoSys & Automic	IBM Workload Automation (Tivoli)	Tibco Data Synapse	IBM Symphony	IBM LSF	Oozie	Yarn	Azkaban	Mesosphere	AWS Batch
Scalability	Yes, 10K nodes	No	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	N/A	Yes	N/A	Yes	Partial
Performance	Yes, very high	No	No	No	Partial	Partial	Yes	N/A	Yes	N/A	Yes	Yes
Workflow expressivity	Yes, any language, advanced structures	No	No	No	No	No	No	Partial	No	Partial	No	No
Powerful Scheduling (priority, etc.)	Yes, dynamic priorities	Static	Static	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Partial	No	Yes	No	Partial
Resource management	Yes, multi-sources and policies	No	No	Partial	No	No	Single cluster	N/A	Hadoop only	N/A	Single cluster	No
Modern / open architecture	Yes, microservices, all with REST API	No	No	No	No	No	No	N/A	Hadoop only	N/A	C plugin	Yes
Cloud integration	Yes, multi-clouds with native hybrid architecture	No	No	Yes	No	No	No	No	No	No	No	Single cloud
Available on-prem	Yes, multi-clouds with native hybrid architecture	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Big data orchestration & metascheduling	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	No	No	Partial (Hadoop only)	No	Partial (Hadoop only)	Partial (resource only)	No